17cb212dfcd0e69bc28e9fec652acfa4
-
Archives
- September 2018
- February 2017
- October 2015
- December 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2008
- July 2008
- February 2008
-
Meta
I was always intrigued by his posts in this vain – but I do not recall him ever revealing what he wrote. Are you planning to do so?
42
>I was always intrigued by his posts in this vain – but I do not recall him ever revealing what he wrote. Are you planning to do so?
My guess: If the prediction comes true you reveal the hash source.. if it doesn’t, you hope everyone forgets the whole thing
Further to the above comments: you should improve upon roc’s version by posting a date when you’ll reveal the text for each one. Otherwise a) it’s really irritating to everyone else ;-), and b) there’s no risk of confirmation bias, where you reveal the predictions you got right!
Gerv
I was just thinking yesterday to write to him to ask if he’d do a write up on his hash-nuggets (including any messages he wouldn’t mind revealing today).
Bah. Post the weakly encrypted text itself, so in ~20 years it’ll be possible to recover the original message, given some determination. For anthropology.
ruben van de velde ? 😛
Pingback: ??? ??