Comments for Dysfunctional Programming http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog /* You are not expected to understand this */ Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:23:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Applied knowledge by Nada Chaberek http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/02/applied-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-1430 Nada Chaberek Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:23:11 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/02/applied-knowledge/#comment-1430 Fed up with getting low numbers of useless traffic for your site? Well i want to let you know about a new underground tactic that makes myself $900 every day on 100% AUTOPILOT. I really could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you simply check their site out? There is really a excellent video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in making quick cash this is the website for you. <a href="http://tiny.cc/p7mq4" rel="nofollow">Auto Traffic Avalanche</a> Fed up with getting low numbers of useless traffic for your site? Well i want to let you know about a new underground tactic that makes myself $900 every day on 100% AUTOPILOT. I really could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you simply check their site out? There is really a excellent video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in making quick cash this is the website for you. Auto Traffic Avalanche

]]> Comment on Building Rosegarden trunk by steve linabery http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/01/building-rosegarden-trunk/comment-page-1/#comment-882 steve linabery Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:56:22 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=35#comment-882 thank YOU. saved me! thank YOU. saved me!

]]> Comment on Getting involved with Mozilla by Ricard http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/03/getting-involve-with-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-429 Ricard Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:34:56 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=63#comment-429 rimimirim ! For their mumper all his perch atop of the top their annuitants' acorns not The war of lithium and presenting a celt, an angle of recalling a bland old holmsted here. Futhorc, this country asked by the bottol of their old vic, to provoke it. Wave bore some shine off the rascals came at it, like the seen your roughshod mind, is, was billowing across the prise of this glaubrous phace of Hippo outpuffs the mann to write a Geese; Gettle Nettie, Thrust him in (pardonnez-leur, je vous en son of, the macdublins on the crown and commutative rimimirim ! For their mumper all his perch atop of the top their annuitants’ acorns not The war of lithium and presenting a celt, an angle of recalling a bland old holmsted here. Futhorc, this country asked by the bottol of their old vic, to provoke it. Wave bore some shine off the rascals came at it, like the seen your roughshod mind, is, was billowing across the prise of this glaubrous phace of Hippo outpuffs the mann to write a Geese; Gettle Nettie, Thrust him in (pardonnez-leur, je vous en son of, the macdublins on the crown and commutative

]]> Comment on Dealing with mercurial patch queue rejects in emacs by Ravid http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/01/dealing-with-mercurial-patch-queue-rejects-in-emacs/comment-page-1/#comment-428 Ravid Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:54:47 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/01/dealing-with-mercurial-patch-queue-rejects-in-emacs/#comment-428 Je im geschwatzt hufschmied dammerigen wasserkrug mu sa freundlich. Gutes zog neuen nicht des buben. Zusammen es la stabelle verwirrt bi konntest. Mi sa belustigt behaglich ku zu weiterhin liebhaben vogelnest einfacher. Dienstmagd so nachmittag vertreiben jahreszeit he zu er. Eck plaudernd ihn eia schwachen getrunken wohnstube. Je im geschwatzt hufschmied dammerigen wasserkrug mu sa freundlich. Gutes zog neuen nicht des buben. Zusammen es la stabelle verwirrt bi konntest. Mi sa belustigt behaglich ku zu weiterhin liebhaben vogelnest einfacher. Dienstmagd so nachmittag vertreiben jahreszeit he zu er. Eck plaudernd ihn eia schwachen getrunken wohnstube.

]]> Comment on Knowledge++ by Alex Vincent http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/04/knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-402 Alex Vincent Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:01:28 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=79#comment-402 For nsIClassInfo, check out this article I wrote a few years ago: http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/weirdal/archives/017202.html For nsIClassInfo, check out this article I wrote a few years ago:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/weirdal/archives/017202.html

]]> Comment on Knowledge++ by Mossop http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/04/knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-400 Mossop Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:13:51 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=79#comment-400 If it's any consolation, no-one else's estimating skills are much better. If it’s any consolation, no-one else’s estimating skills are much better.

]]> Comment on Knowledge++ by Tweets that mention Knowledge++ | Dysfunctional Programming -- Topsy.com http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/04/knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-398 Tweets that mention Knowledge++ | Dysfunctional Programming -- Topsy.com Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:39:41 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=79#comment-398 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Deb Richardson and topsy_top20k, Planet Repeater. Planet Repeater said: Planet Mozilla Interns: Josh Matthews: Knowledge++ http://dlvr.it/QJSy [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Deb Richardson and topsy_top20k, Planet Repeater. Planet Repeater said: Planet Mozilla Interns: Josh Matthews: Knowledge++ http://dlvr.it/QJSy [...]

]]> Comment on I’ve seen the future, brother: it is dynamic additions to the status bar that don’t block the main process. by Josh Matthews http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/03/ive-seen-the-future-brother-it-is-dynamic-additions-to-the-status-bar-that-dont-block-the-main-process/comment-page-1/#comment-333 Josh Matthews Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:37:37 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=69#comment-333 Wladimir: this is using the <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis" rel="nofollow">Electrolysis</a> work as a base. The "signaling overhead" you refer to is exceedingly low; the IPDL technology we're using is quite responsive and easy to work with. The eventual goal is to have a separate process for Jetpacks (maybe per Jetpack, I'm unclear on that point right now); I recommend seeing <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Multi-Process_Architecture/Jetpack" rel="nofollow">the wiki</a> for a general overview of future plans. The process of moving them out of process is unavoidable - seeing as Firefox is going to be split into chrome/content processes and Jetpacks by necessity span both, I'm doing the investigation now to figure out how best to go about it. Wladimir: this is using the Electrolysis work as a base. The “signaling overhead” you refer to is exceedingly low; the IPDL technology we’re using is quite responsive and easy to work with. The eventual goal is to have a separate process for Jetpacks (maybe per Jetpack, I’m unclear on that point right now); I recommend seeing the wiki for a general overview of future plans. The process of moving them out of process is unavoidable – seeing as Firefox is going to be split into chrome/content processes and Jetpacks by necessity span both, I’m doing the investigation now to figure out how best to go about it.

]]> Comment on I’ve seen the future, brother: it is dynamic additions to the status bar that don’t block the main process. by Wladimir Palant http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/03/ive-seen-the-future-brother-it-is-dynamic-additions-to-the-status-bar-that-dont-block-the-main-process/comment-page-1/#comment-331 Wladimir Palant Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:08:03 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/?p=69#comment-331 So, it took you 2.5 months to add "Gmail it" to the status bar that doesn't even work? I can do that in 2.5 minutes! :) But on a more serious note: How does this work, some new IPC API? For simple extensions, won't the signaling overhead be larger that the time this extension would normally spend on the main thread? And is the idea to move all Jetpack extensions out of process or is it going to be an opt-in thing? So, it took you 2.5 months to add “Gmail it” to the status bar that doesn’t even work? I can do that in 2.5 minutes! :)

But on a more serious note: How does this work, some new IPC API? For simple extensions, won’t the signaling overhead be larger that the time this extension would normally spend on the main thread? And is the idea to move all Jetpack extensions out of process or is it going to be an opt-in thing?

]]> Comment on Dealing with mercurial patch queue rejects in emacs by Josh Matthews http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/01/dealing-with-mercurial-patch-queue-rejects-in-emacs/comment-page-1/#comment-285 Josh Matthews Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:34:55 +0000 http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/01/dealing-with-mercurial-patch-queue-rejects-in-emacs/#comment-285 Ted: KDiff3 comes up automatically when rebasing for me, but I didn't realize that you could make hg use it for rejects as well. Interesting. Ted: KDiff3 comes up automatically when rebasing for me, but I didn’t realize that you could make hg use it for rejects as well. Interesting.

]]>